Is Technology a Friend or Foe to Food?

By Ezra Klein

PH2009090100824.jpgNora Ephron’s “Julie & Julia” has plunged us deep into a bout of Julia Child nostalgia. And what could be more delightful, or delicious? The movie has grossed more than $60 million — not bad for a flick about a cookbook author and a blogger. Child’s “Mastering the Art of French Cooking” sits atop the New York Times bestseller list for the first time in the book’s 48-year history. Millions are discovering her painstaking approach to cuisine for the first time. Bon appetit!

But as so often happens with nostalgia, the past is being massaged to fit the needs of the present. In the movie, Amy Adams, playing blogger Julie Powell, tries to explain the importance of Child to her husband. “She changed everything,” Powell says. “Before her, it was frozen food and can openers and marshmallows.” And after her? Most of us have all three in our kitchens. And no rendered beef tallow in our freezer.

“I felt like jumping up in my seat in the movie and saying, ‘No, no, no!’ ” says Laura Shapiro, author of “Julia Child: A Life.” “There were things that came in cans she liked just fine, like chicken broth. She dubbed Uncle Ben’s rice ‘l’Oncle Ben’s.’ ” Child adored supermarkets and admired McDonald’s. She thought premade pie crust a wonderful invention and was supportive of irradiating food for safety. Cooking, for her, was not in conflict with progress. Rather it was, or could be, in partnership with it.

Some of Child’s successors, however, have a more tortured relationship with the march of culinary technology. They survey the landscape and see little but high-fructose corn syrup and drive-through windows. If that’s progress, they’ll take the past. And there’s some evidence to support that position. A 2003 study by economists David Cutler, Ed Glaeser and Jesse Shapiro found that the rise in obesity over the past few decades could not be explained simply by food becoming cheaper or people consuming more meals in restaurants. It was the result of technological achievement.

The major differences in caloric intake aren’t due to larger meals. (In fact, there’s some evidence that we’re eating less at dinner than we used to.) The problem is we’re taking in more calories between meals, a direct consequence of technological innovation spurring the production of calorie-dense, long-lasting, shelf-stable foods. In 1977, Americans reported eating about 186 calories between meals. By 1994, that had rocketed to 346 calories. That difference alone is enough to explain the changes in our national waistline.

Read on…

8 responses to “Is Technology a Friend or Foe to Food?

  1. Where’s the top chef blogging?

  2. Oh, I didn’t even notice that the ‘read on’ was going to take me to WaPo; I lazily assumed it was just going to expand the article. I’ll have to remember to be more careful in the future when I click on links here.

  3. Do you dislike going to the Washington Post?

  4. Why would you send us to a right wing porn site? ;)

    Personally I’m a fan of being upfront about reposting something. You’ve got this three places now… at least… is it that big a deal to throw a blurb up to say where this is from? I can understand why you’d repost it (comments etc), but I don’t know why you wouldn’t make it obvious.

  5. Yeah, I have to agree. I’m very pro-crossposting, but I think it’s generally good internet form to state up-front that you’re doing so, especially if it’s a longer piece.

  6. Just to follow up: Yes, I dislike going to the Washington Post. It’s not some strict boycott or anything and, really, it’s my fault for not at least looking at the link before I clicked… not that doing so is all that great of a safeguard from going to disreputable websites.

  7. Not to be too contrary, but I don’t see the big deal of jumping to another website. You’re not going to get cooties from clicking on a WaPo link.

  8. No cooties, I agree, but it wouldn’t take too much time to throw on a “This is an article I published in the Post and was hoping to get some comments from the IFA community:” or something.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s