Forbidden Foods

By Sara Mead

The Washington Post‘s Valerie Strauss has had some good school meets food blogging this week. Today, she’s investigating the Department of Agriculture’s list of “foods of minimal nutritional value,” which schools participating in the school lunch program may not allow to be sold on school premises during school lunch or breakfast hours. It’s a pretty random list, barring the sale of some items, such as carbonated water (as part of a larger soda/pop ban) and gum, that are neither bad for kids nor substitutes for more nutritious food, while permitting the sale of an awful lot of high-calorie, high-fat, low-nutrition junk.

Earlier in the week, Strauss bemoaned the high sugar content–more than kids should eat in an entire day–in many district-provided school breakfasts. This is a good illustration of why I’m impatient with Alice Waters-style  efforts to upgrade the school lunch program with more organic, locally raised, and home cooked food. The bar some school lunch reformers want to set is so, so far away from where we are now, and I worry that it distracts from simpler, more realistic, and more affordable ways to really improve the nutritional content of what kids are getting in school.

A really sugary school breakfast is not good for kids. It hypes them up first thing in the morning, then leads to a mid-morning crash, neither of which is good for teaching and learning. Sugary cereals also have negative dental implications for low-income kids who may not have access to regular dental care. Kids should be getting complex carbs and protein at breakfast, not a ton of sugar. But reducing the sugar content and upping the protein and complex carbs in school breakfast has nothing to do with organic and local ingredients or on-site preparation.  Simply substituting the sugary cereal with a higher fiber, lower sugar generic boxed cereal, or instant oatmeal, would be a world of improvement. Replacing orange juice with milk, water, fresh oranges, or even canned fruit cups in light syrup would also be an improvement. Donuts and pop tarts should not be sold during school breakfast. Period. Doing any of these things would probably cost a bit more money than we currently spend, but would likely pay off in improved student attention and learning, and is much less of a stretch than what some school lunch reformers are asking for.

One response to “Forbidden Foods

  1. A number of good points here, but it’s disappointing to see this myth propogated yet again:

    It hypes them up first thing in the morning, then leads to a mid-morning crash, neither of which is good for teaching and learning.

    The so-called “sugar rush” has repeatedly failed to manifest in any sort of double-blind study, and most of the scientific world hs concluded that it is a specious piece of folk wisdom with an uncommonly tight grip. (Rather like the idea that we lose 10% of our body heat through our heads.) I’m all for feeding children better food, but let’s do it for health reasons that actually, you know, exist.

    Sources:
    http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/11-health-myths-that-may-surprise-you/?apage=2

    http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2747/does-giving-sweets-to-kids-produce-a-sugar-rush

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s